%0 Journal Article
%@nexthigherunit 8JMKD3MGPCW/43SRC6S
%@holdercode {isadg {BR SPINPE} ibi 8JMKD3MGPCW/3DT298S}
%@archivingpolicy denypublisher denyfinaldraft
%@secondarytype PRE PI
%@issn 0030-3917
%3 Mariano_aerosols.pdf
%D 2011
%4 dpi.inpe.br/plutao/2011/06.11.03.44
%T Aerosols Monitoring in Rio Claro, Brazil: Using LIDAR and Air Pollution Analyzers
%@usergroup administrator
%@usergroup lattes
%@usergroup marciana
%@usergroup valdirene
%V 44
%@affiliation Universidade Federal de Pelotas- UFPEL, Pelotas, RS
%@affiliation Instituto de Pesquisas Energética e Nucleares - IPEN/CNEM/CLA, São Paulo, Br
%@affiliation Universidade de São Paulo, Escola Politecnica, Departamento de Engenharia Quimica, São Paulo, BR
%@affiliation Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)
%@affiliation Instituto de Pesquisas Energética e Nucleares - IPEN/CNEM/CLA, São Paulo, Br
%@affiliation IPMET/UNESP, Bauru, BR
%@affiliation CEAPLA/UNESP, Cubatão, BR
%F lattes: 0505792868023399 4 MarianoLoStMaLaHePi:2011:UsLIAi
%@resumeid
%@resumeid
%@resumeid
%@resumeid
%@resumeid
%@resumeid
%@resumeid 8JMKD3MGP5W/3C9JJ7R
%@versiontype publisher
%X Brazil has an important role in the biomass burning aerosol activity. During the Dry Season (June-September) of 2009 an aerosol profiling campaign was carried out using a backscattering and Raman lidar system in Rio Claro-SP, Brazil (22º23´S and 47º32´W). The main goal of this campain was to observe the biomass burning aerosol load due to sugarcane crops and also study the air dispersion condictions, planetary boundary and mixed layer daily evolution. In this paper we aim to present the preliminary results of the influence of this type of aerosl the cuty of Rio Claro-SP, Brazil and one case study to evaluate the aerosl profile in a biomass burning episode that occurred in July, 2009. On July 15 an intense burning was observed about 300 m away from the lidar location. Throughtut the measurements it was observed that the plumes. The gas analyzers showed a strong influence of this burning as it was noticed in the measurements of CO, NOx and nephelometer, ehereas the PM10 did not have due to this burning, possibly because the particulate was deposited further from the emission source, not being detected by the equipment.
%( sid.inpe.br/mtc-m19/2010/11.22.12.17
%@area MET
%@secondarykey INPE--PRE/
%@electronicmailaddress
%@electronicmailaddress
%@electronicmailaddress
%@electronicmailaddress maria.paulete@cptec.inpe.br
%@documentstage not transferred
%K biomass burning, aerossol, pollution.
%@e-mailaddress maria.paulete@cptec.inpe.br
%@group
%@group
%@group
%@group DSA-CPT-INPE-MCT-BR
%N 1
%@dissemination WEBSCI
%P 55-64
%A Mariano, Glauber Lopes,
%A Lopes, Fabio J.,
%A Steffens, Juliana,
%A Martins, Maria Paulete Pereira,
%A Landulfo, Eduardo,
%A Held, Gerhard,
%A Pinto, Sergio dos Anjos Ferreira,
%B Óptica Pura y Aplicada
%2 dpi.inpe.br/plutao/2011/06.11.03.44.24