%0 Book Section
%@nexthigherunit 8JMKD3MGPCW/3F2UALS
%4 sid.inpe.br/plutao/2018/06.18.15.44.22
%A Leite Filho, Waldemar de Castro,
%A Guimarães, Júlia de Albuquerque,
%A Galembeck, Lucas,
%@secondarytype PRE LI
%B Advances in aerospace guidance, navigation and control
%D 2018
%E Dolega, Buguslaw,
%E Glebocki, Robert,
%E Kordos, Damian,
%E Zugaj, Marcin,
%F lattes: 2129756520636332 2 LeiteFoGuimGale:2018:MIAtCo
%I Springer International Publishing
%K MIMO, attitude control.
%P 571-584
%T MIMO attitude control for a spinning rocket
%U http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-65283-2_31
%X When dealing with rockets that present no direct roll control, it is possible that disturbances along the system may introduce some roll rate [10]. The highly coupled nature of the rockets equations of motion make the study of its dynamic a very complex subject [7, 9]. It is necessary to understand how well a given control system is able to deal with such perturbations. In this paper, we are interested in studying the performance of a multiple-inputmultiple-output (MIMO) controller with roll input and how it compares to a singleinput-single-output (SISO) PID controller when used on a rocket under the influence of an uncontrolled spin rate of parabolic profile. The controllers are compared by analyzing both step response and the ability to send the system to a pre-determined trajectory, with and without the influence of wind perturbations.
%@area ETES
%@electronicmailaddress waldclf@gmail.com
%@documentstage not transferred
%@group CMC-ETES-SESPG-INPE-MCTIC-GOV-BR
%@group CMC-ETES-SESPG-INPE-MCTIC-GOV-BR
%@isbn 9783319652825
%@usergroup lattes
%@affiliation Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)
%@affiliation Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)
%@affiliation Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)
%@versiontype publisher
%@holdercode {isadg {BR SPINPE} ibi 8JMKD3MGPCW/3DT298S}
%@doi 10.1007/978-3-319-65283-2_31
%2 sid.inpe.br/plutao/2018/06.18.15.44.23